<\body> Stories in America: Army Times, Air Force Times, Navy Times, Marine Corps Times: Rumsfeld Must Go

Saturday, November 04, 2006

Army Times, Air Force Times, Navy Times, Marine Corps Times: Rumsfeld Must Go

This editorial is scheduled to run on Monday. How will the Bush cabal and Swift Boat Vets for Lies spin this one?
"So long as our government requires the backing of an aroused and informed public opinion ... it is necessary to tell the hard bruising truth."

That statement was written by Pulitzer Prize-winning war correspondent Marguerite Higgins more than a half-century ago during the Korean War.

But until recently, the "hard bruising" truth about the Iraq war has been difficult to come by from leaders in Washington. One rosy reassurance after another has been handed down by President Bush, Vice President Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld: "mission accomplished," the insurgency is "in its last throes," and "back off," we know what we're doing, are a few choice examples.

Military leaders generally toed the line, although a few retired generals eventually spoke out from the safety of the sidelines, inciting criticism equally from anti-war types, who thought they should have spoken out while still in uniform, and pro-war foes, who thought the generals should have kept their critiques behind closed doors.

Now, however, a new chorus of criticism is beginning to resonate. Active-duty military leaders are starting to voice misgivings about the war's planning, execution and dimming prospects for success.

Army Gen. John Abizaid, chief of U.S. Central Command, told a Senate Armed Services Committee in September: "I believe that the sectarian violence is probably as bad as I've seen it ... and that if not stopped, it is possible that Iraq could move towards civil war."

Last week, someone leaked to The New York Times a Central Command briefing slide showing an assessment that the civil conflict in Iraq now borders on "critical" and has been sliding toward "chaos" for most of the past year. The strategy in Iraq has been to train an Iraqi army and police force that could gradually take over for U.S. troops in providing for the security of their new government and their nation.

But despite the best efforts of American trainers, the problem of molding a viciously sectarian population into anything resembling a force for national unity has become a losing proposition.


For two years, American sergeants, captains and majors training the Iraqis have told their bosses that Iraqi troops have no sense of national identity, are only in it for the money, don't show up for duty and cannot sustain themselves.

Meanwhile, colonels and generals have asked their bosses for more troops. Service chiefs have asked for more money.

And all along, Rumsfeld has assured us that things are well in hand.

Now, the president says he'll stick with Rumsfeld for the balance of his term in the White House.

This is a mistake.

It is one thing for the majority of Americans to think Rumsfeld has failed. But when the nation's current military leaders start to break publicly with their defense secretary, then it is clear that he is losing control of the institution he ostensibly leads.

These officers have been loyal public promoters of a war policy many privately feared would fail. They have kept their counsel private, adhering to more than two centuries of American tradition of subordination of the military to civilian authority.

And although that tradition, and the officers' deep sense of honor, prevent them from saying this publicly, more and more of them believe it.

Rumsfeld has lost credibility with the uniformed leadership, with the troops, with Congress and with the public at large. His strategy has failed, and his ability to lead is compromised. And although the blame for our failures in Iraq rests with the secretary, it will be the troops who bear its brunt.

This is not about the midterm elections. Regardless of which party wins Nov. 7, the time has come, Mr. President, to face the hard bruising truth:

Donald Rumsfeld must go.

4 Comments:

At 11/04/2006 1:01 PM, Blogger Jack Boo said...

What in the world makes you think the Swift Boat Vets will "spin" this?

 
At 11/04/2006 4:09 PM, Blogger Jack Boo said...

By the way, just in case someone might get the wrong idea...those are industry magazines published by Gannett, which also owns USAToday. They're "military" magazines in the sense they cover the military.

But not "military magazines" in the sense that they're actually published by the armed forces.

And again, despite suggestions to the contrary, the Swift Boat Vets will not be spinning this story one way or the other.

 
At 11/04/2006 4:29 PM, Blogger Jack Boo said...

Here'the United States Department of Defense response to the Military Times editorials calling for Rumsfeld's resignation....

http://www.defenselink.mil/home/dodupdate/index-b.html

 
At 6/01/2007 8:43 AM, Blogger drtgreen said...

Amazon.Com and Dr. Green have inaugurated an ebook Series to Support American Veterans
The equivalent of dozens of hours and thousands of dollars of psychological consultation for only $.49
Pass it on to a Returning War Veteran on Memorial Day

The Proper Care Of the Returning American War Veteran

http://www.amazon.com/Proper-Care-Returning-American-Veteran/dp/B000Q66J7G/ref=sr_1_6
/104-3409163-1100711?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1179338709&sr=1-6

Part I From Discharge, Separation or Disability
Part II War and Its Effect on Emotions
Part III Combat and The impact on Women and Families
Part IV The Impact of Military Service on the Political Priorities of the President
Part V A 101 Point Guide for Veteran Families and Returning Veterans

Due July 4, 2007, Watch for it!

The Virginia Tech Shooting Tragedy
Understanding The Most Horrific Personal Tragedy Committed by One Person in One Day, Outside of War, in the History of Modern Civilization
What Every College Family Should Know About That Tragedy


Coming in fall, 2007

The Proper Criticism of the World Illegal Immigration Crisis Parts I-V,
Guess whom the returning Iraq war veterans in every nation in the world will have to battle at the ballot box for control of their own country after the next illegal immigrant amnesty legislation bill passes when they return home?

About Amazon Shorts:


Amazon Shorts are available exclusively at Amazon.com; you will not find them anywhere else.


Amazon Shorts are delivered electronically; there are no printed editions.


Amazon Shorts are yours forever – after purchase, you can read them anytime at Amazon.com. (They'll be stored forever in Your Media Library in PDF, HTML, and text e-mail formats.)


You are free to print Amazon Shorts to read in hard copy form at your convenience.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home