<\body> Stories in America: Before Roe v. Wade

Sunday, January 22, 2006

Before Roe v. Wade

Today marks the 33rd anniversary of Roe v. Wade. It's amazing that people actually pray to go back to the days before Roe. Many of these people oppose birth control and social programs. A Republican I recently met said many in the GOP do not want Roe v. Wade overturned because they will have no choice but to increase spending on social programs and welfare will be out of control. Who cares about the woman; it's all about economics.

Three people who helped provide abortions before Roe tell their stories to AlterNet:
Mildred Hanson, M.D.

A featured speaker at several congressional briefings on abortion, Hanson spent 30 years as the medical director of what was then Planned Parenthood of Minnesota and South Dakota. Today, she oversees her own Minnesota clinic, where, at the age of 82, she provides abortions to women from Iowa, Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.

"In 1935, when I was 11 years old, my mother left our Wisconsin house on a bitter February night and dashed to the farm next door to help an ailing woman who'd had an illegal abortion. Our neighbor was writhing in pain so severe that she was having convulsions and was chewing her lip raw. It took her two days to die of blood poisoning. She left six children behind - and left me with firsthand knowledge of the injustice of illegal abortion.

"Fresh out of medical school in 1959, I developed a reputation for being the only doctor in this region who would treat women with bleeding, lacerations, and other complications stemming from back-alley procedures. Illegal abortionists would refer their clients to me in the event of complications. In addition to helping these patients, I offered legal abortions to women within the hospital system, which sanctioned the procedure if it was deemed medically necessary. I coached these women on how to get approval. 'Tell hospital officials you are destitute,' I said. 'Tell them you are devastated and will commit suicide if you can't terminate this pregnancy.' If Roe v. Wade were overturned today and if medical exceptions were still allowed, I would tell my patients the same things all over again. For the first time in my life, I would also perform illegal abortions. I didn't do so before Roe v. Wade because I was a divorced mother with four children to support. But today I have nothing to lose and believe reproductive rights are so important that I'm willing to risk whatever legal action or prison time I might face."

Jane Hodgson, M.D.

In 1970, Hodgson challenged a Minnesota law that banned abortion by providing an abortion to a mother of three whose pregnancy was affected by German measles, which can cause blindness, kidney failure, and cognitive problems in developing infants. She was convicted of a felony, but because the legal process dragged on until after Roe v. Wade passed in 1973, her sentence was overturned and she did not serve prison time. In 1990, Hodgson was the lead plaintiff in the U.S. Supreme Court case Hodgson v. Minnesota, which unsuccessfully challenged parental notification laws. A founding fellow of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and a recipient of the PPFA Margaret Sanger Award, Hodgson is now 91 and a speaker for Medical Students for Choice.

"Over the course of my 60-year career, I've done a lot of volunteer work overseas in countries where abortion is illegal. I've seen women who had botched procedures soak their mattresses through with blood. I've seen countless other women die.

"People in the United States don't know about these horrors. Nor do they remember what women's lives were like here before abortion became legal. Before 1973, single women who got pregnant were fired from their jobs. Younger ones were sent to maternity homes for unwed mothers and their children were put up for adoption. Married women who got pregnant were forced to carry pregnancies to term regardless of their circumstances - even if they had so many children that they couldn't afford to feed another one; even if they had metastasized cancer; even if their fetuses couldn't live outside the womb because these fetuses had developed without a heart or brain.

"Since Roe v. Wade, I've performed thousands of abortions and supervised thousands more. I haven't regretted a single one. I didn't regret it when the head of my own university testified against me for offering an abortion to the mother with German measles. I didn't regret it when anti-choice protestors picketed my home or mobbed my office so I had to have police protection to get inside the building. I believe legal abortion is a medical procedure that saves women's lives. It's not just a matter of choice. It's a matter of good medicine."

The Reverend Howard Moody

In 1967, Moody spearheaded New York City's Clergy Consultation Service on Abortion, which helped thousands of women obtain safe, illegal abortions before New York sanctioned the procedure in 1970. Considered the "Harriet Tubman of the abortion rights movement," Moody, now 84, has received the PPFA Margaret Sanger Award and serves on the advisory board of NARAL Pro-Choice America.

"To get an abortion before it was legal, a woman had to meet someone in a parking lot late at night and be taken to some unknown place. She had no idea whose hands she was in -- or if she would even survive. To provide safety and support to women in this horrible situation, we formed a coalition of 26 clergy members to counsel women considering abortion and refer them to doctors we knew were safe. Most clergy at that time would not condone abortion. In fact, they wouldn't even discuss it. But our members -- Baptist, Episcopal, Jewish, Lutheran, Methodist, and Presbyterian -- saw this as part of their ministry.

"Nowhere in scripture does it say women should not have reproductive rights. Theologically and morally, we knew this was the right choice even if it was against the law. Our ministers sat with women and helped them make the decisions they faced. Over the years, I personally counseled hundreds of women ages 12 to 45. Not one of them was flip about her decision. Women of all faiths had such a desperate need for counseling and referrals that they flooded to see us from across the eastern United States.

"We worked six hours a day, six days a week. To meet the demand for abortions, my Baptist congregation even considered creating an illegal clinic on the grounds of Judson Memorial Church [in New York City]. But New York legalized abortion in 1970, and so we focused on other efforts: launching Manhattan's Center for Reproductive Sexual Health, one of the first legal abortion clinics, and expanding our network, which eventually grew to include 1,400 ministers and rabbis across the nation."


At 1/23/2006 10:18 AM, Anonymous timmy said...

Another reason Republicans might support abortion is that it reduces the number of Democrats. Given that more liberals get abortions and in general have fewer children, over time it dimishes their impact at the ballot box...as is happening in Europe.

The demography of Europe is being profoundly influenced by the huge gap dividing the birth rates of Western and immigrant (i.e. Islamic) populations. Unless current demographic trends are radically altered (and there’s no sign of that), the high fertility of Islamic immigrants (who abhor abortion and put a high priority on large family’s), coupled with the low fertility rates of "Western" Europeans; the majority of continent will inevitably be Muslim. And sooner than you think.

Already the population of Europe is dropping rapidly and growing older. By 2050, Italy's population will have fallen by 22%, Bulgaria's by 36%, Estonia's by 52%.

In contrast, the population of Muslim nations (and their immigrant populations in European countries) is skyrocketing.

Of course, in America the situation is different, but there are interesting parallels. Because of the low fertility rates of progressive liberals, their demographic piece of the pie within the Democratic Party becomes less influential every day. The future of the Democrats is going to have to come from the only demographic within their party that is growing...the immigrant population.

It will be interesting to see how it all works out. Immigrants are generally fiscally liberal, but socially they tend more conservative. Gay and women's rights issues don't get the same traction in East L.A. that they do in San Francisco.

I know, this is kinda off the subject, but there is inter-relatedness to this stuff. “My body, my choice” is an important consideration -- but just as abortion overwhelmingly targets females, there’s much to think about here.

At 7/31/2011 12:33 AM, Anonymous тендеры на строительство и ремонт said...

Pretty effective data, thanks so much for your article.

At 10/08/2011 2:40 PM, Anonymous www.mueblesennavarra.com said...

Pretty worthwhile data, lots of thanks for your post.


Post a Comment

<< Home